Compare and contrast william seward john calhoun and daniel websters arguement

Henry Clay of Kentucky, John C.

Compare and contrast william seward john calhoun and daniel websters arguement

Would you like to merge this question into it? MERGE already exists as an alternate of this question. Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it? MERGE exists and is an alternate of. He also wanted to exclude slavery from the Southwest.

Clahoun was on the opposite end as far as the slavery issue and felt any states and territories in the Southwest should be slave states.

The debates over the Compromise of 1850 proved vicious and intense. Read the 3 s

Webster came in and brought the two points together and helped form what would be the compromise based on the two positions. What was the Compromise of ? The Compromise of was a series of bills that wanted to resolvethe territorial and slavery controversies arising from theMexican-American War There were 5 laws which balancedthe interests of the slave states of the South of Missouri and thefree states to the north.

California was admitted as a free state;Texas received financial compensation for relinquishing claim tolands west of the Rio Grande in what is now New Mexico; theterritory of New Mexico including present-day Arizona and aportion of southern Nevada was organized without any specificprohibition of slavery; the slave trade but not slavery itself was terminated in the District of Columbia; and the stringentFugitive Slave Law was passed, requiring all U.

The measures were opposedby Senator John C. The Compromise was possible after thedeath of President Zachary Taylor, who was in opposition. Succeeding President Taylor was a strong supporter of thecompromise: It temporarily defused sectionaltensions in the United States, postponing the secession crisis andthe American Civil War.

The Compromise dropped the Wilmot Proviso,which never became law but would have banned slavery in territoryacquired from Mexico. Thevarious compromises lessened political contention for four years,until the relative lull was shattered by the divisiveKansas-Nebraska Act.

On January 29,the year-old Clay presented a compromise. Calhoun, senator from South Carolina, debated the compromise. With the help of Stephen Douglas, a young Democrat from Illinois, a series of bills that would make up the compromise were ushered through Congress. According to the compromise, Texas would relinquish the land in dispute but, in compensation, be given 10 million dollars -- money it would use to pay off its debt to Mexico.

The debates over the Compromise of proved vicious and intense. Read the 3 s - Academic Writing

Also, the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah would be organized without mention of slavery. Regarding Washington, the slave trade would be abolished in the District of Columbia, although slavery would still be permitted. Finally, California would be admitted as a free state.

To pacify slave-state politicians, who would have objected to the imbalance created by adding another free state, the Fugitive Slave Act was passed. He proposed a solution to satisfy both the North and the South and prevent the possibility of the dissolution of the Union.

His idea was to take the northeastern area of Massachusetts and create a new entity, namely the State of Maine. As a free State this would balance the entry of Missouri as a slave State. This would at the time preserve the balance in both the US Senate and the country.

What is the compromise of ? It was an act made by Henry Clay declaring California as a free non-slave state and allowing popular sovereignty everywhere else.

Following the Texas Annexation December 29, and the Mexican-American Warthere was a four year long confrontation between the slave states of the American South, and the free states of the American north, that arose from expectation of territorial expansion of the US.

The "Compromise of " defused this tension, and staved off secession or civil war at the time, and quieted sectional conflict. For more details, see the Related Link below. Compare and contrast of the north and the south views on slavery in the US during the early s? The South believed they needed slaves and the North was against it.The historian Daniel Czitrom has called this phenomenon "Lifestyle."21 In the fifties and sixties, the sitcom had offered the Depression-born post-World War II adult group a vision of peaceful, prosperous suburban life centered on the stable nuclear family.

Compare and contrast william seward john calhoun and daniel websters arguement

William Seward, John Calhoun, and Daniel Webster all served as legislator as either Senator or Congressman and then took positions in the executive branch of the government.

William Seward and Daniel Webster were both members of the Whig Party, while John Calhoun was a member of the Republican Party. The Whig Party was a .

Jul 06,  · Two major Choctaw chiefs in the treaty party died before it was signed. Had they lived the mixed-blood percentage would have been 40%. Extracted from Kappler[] One of the most apparent facts to emerge from Chart 19 is the high percent of mixed bloods participating in the major cession treaties of , , and Free Essays on Comparing And Contrasting William Seward John Calhoun And Daniel Webster.

Get help with your writing. 1 through Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun were the leadi ng figures of the generation preceding the Civil War, with Clay and Calhoun pro-slavery and Webster against. William Seward and.

Three Senatorial Giants: Clay, Calhoun and Webster Henry Clay of Kentucky, John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, Daniel Webster spoke three days after Calhoun's speech.

With the nation's fate in the balance, he pleaded with northerners to accept southern demands, for the sake of Union.

William Henry Seward's Higher Law Speech